full

full
Published on:

21st Jul 2025

Postnups That Protect: Strengthening Marriage with Legal Clarity and Collaborative Agreements

🎧 Episode Description:

Discover how postnuptial agreements can help strengthen your marriage, clarify finances, and protect your future—whether you're navigating a life shift, building a business, or staying at home to raise kids. In this follow-up episode, collaborative attorney Melissa Miroslavich joins us again to explore how postnups work, when they make sense, and why they’re about resilience—not failure. This is essential listening for women planning wisely, staying married, or preparing for what-ifs.

Learn how postnups provide financial transparency, reduce conflict, and empower couples to create a shared vision. Whether you're already married or want to build your marital estate plan, this episode will give you new tools and insights for Doing Life Different.


Timestamps:


(00:00) Welcome back to Melissa Miroslavich


(01:42) What is a postnuptial agreement?


(04:08) When postnups make sense during marriage


(06:32) Financial transparency and disclosure


(10:15) Postnups and stay-at-home spouses


(13:28) Collaborative law vs traditional attorneys


(17:55) Why postnups are about resilience, not divorce


(21:40) Key limitations around custody and child support


(24:00) Legal enforceability and the 2-year rule


(28:43) Final thoughts and how to contact Melissa

🔑 Key Takeaways:




  • Postnuptial agreements are legal tools that protect both partners when life changes mid-marriage.



  • They provide financial clarity, especially in cases involving businesses, stay-at-home parenting, or inheritance.



  • In Minnesota, both parties must be represented by attorneys for a postnup to be valid.



  • Postnups are presumed unenforceable if divorce is filed within two years of signing—so plan wisely.



  • Collaborative law encourages honest conversations, shared goals, and marital resilience.


👩‍⚖️ Guest Bio:


Melissa Miroslavich is a collaborative attorney based in Woodbury, Minnesota, specializing in estate planning, prenuptial, and postnuptial agreements. Her heart-centered, education-focused approach helps couples create clarity and protect their values, whether staying married or planning for the future. She blends legal expertise with compassion, offering collaborative solutions for modern relationships.

đź”— Resource Links:




  • Connect with Melissa Miroslavich: https://www.miroslavichlaw.com/



  • Part 1 (Prenups Episode): https://player.captivate.fm/episode/b092e8d6-5c81-46c2-9e69-24167ff6657c/


📌 Tags/Keywords:


postnuptial agreements, collaborative law, marriage contracts, marital estate planning, prenuptial agreements, family law Minnesota, stay-at-home mom protection, divorce planning, marriage tools, financial planning marriage, Doing Life Different, Lesa Koski podcast, women and marriage, relationship transparency, legal tips for marriage

Transcript
:

Welcome to part two of Doing Divorce Different, where we have attorney

2

:

Melissa Maro Slage back with us today.

3

:

Last week she talked about

prenuptial agreements.

4

:

So, so insightful.

5

:

I learned so much and I mean, this is

my work, so go back and listen to that.

6

:

If you are thinking

about getting married or.

7

:

You know, maybe thinking about getting

married again after divorce, how you

8

:

wanna do it better the next time around.

9

:

It's a great, great tool.

10

:

Today we're gonna talk about

postnuptial agreements.

11

:

These are agreements that you make

when you're already married, and

12

:

there are many times that you.

13

:

Would want to do this, and

we're gonna talk through that

14

:

all through this episode.

15

:

It can help you if you do end

up in divorce, it can help you

16

:

have a stronger marriage because

you're gonna see your assets.

17

:

Usually people do it when there's

maybe a shift in assets, like

18

:

someone starting a business.

19

:

A new one that I learned

was stay at home moms.

20

:

You can set up how the money would go.

21

:

If something did happen in the future.

22

:

So it's just a great planning tool to

do when you're in the right state of

23

:

mind and not even thinking of divorce.

24

:

And sometimes I have people

coming in to do 'em because

25

:

they wanna save their marriage.

26

:

So it's a great episode.

27

:

Stay tuned.

28

:

We're still thankful that she's back.

29

:

. Speaker 2: Now, if you, if you go into

it, you know, eyes wide open, I think.

30

:

And the conversations I have with clients

who are doing this process, prenup or

31

:

postnup, um, they're really thoughtful

conversations and I think it gives people

32

:

a moment to pause, to think about, oh,

actually, how, how does this work for me?

33

:

I, um, I, I brought this business in

and I own it, and what happens if my

34

:

spouse starts working in the business?

35

:

Or what happens if my spouse

never works in the business?

36

:

What if it goes bust?

37

:

What if it goes amazing?

38

:

Speaker 3: Mm-hmm.

39

:

Speaker 2: And it's a chance

for people to come together and.

40

:

Put together shared goals, essentially.

41

:

Speaker: Well, and I like too that each

party must be represented by an attorney.

42

:

Speaker 2: That's Anup agreement.

43

:

Yeah.

44

:

So here's the thing.

45

:

In prenuptial agreements, and I'm

just gonna keep saying Minnesota

46

:

'cause that's where I am.

47

:

Speaker: Yep.

48

:

Speaker 2: You're not required to have

an attorney for prenuptial agreements.

49

:

I would highly recommend it.

50

:

No, you're

51

:

Speaker: not required to.

52

:

Speaker 2: But I.

53

:

I would wear it for many reasons,

uh, if I'm working with a couple,

54

:

um, in a postnuptial agreement.

55

:

So you're already married.

56

:

That is one of the big differences

between a prenup and a postnup is

57

:

that you are required, at least in

Minnesota to both have attorneys.

58

:

Speaker: I, and I think with a pre,

it would make it hold its weight.

59

:

Much better because the judge would

feel like you were truly understanding

60

:

what you were doing if it did end up.

61

:

So yeah, I would highly recommend that.

62

:

Okay.

63

:

So thank you for going off on a

tangent with prenups 'cause I, I

64

:

have wanted to talk about them and

now if you don't mind, let's kinda.

65

:

Flip into postnuptial.

66

:

Sure.

67

:

And, um, I have called upon you in

cases and it's, it is a case where

68

:

I have a, a couple who has heart

issues and they wanna stay together.

69

:

And so I sent them your way.

70

:

Sometimes I can send really messy things.

71

:

Melissa

72

:

life is messy.

73

:

Yes.

74

:

It's, it's for all of us.

75

:

Um, and so let's talk

about that a little bit.

76

:

So they're married and maybe.

77

:

I I'm gonna let you talk about

what a postnuptial is and then I

78

:

can throw in like little stories

along the way, if that's helpful.

79

:

Speaker 2: Yeah, that's really helpful.

80

:

So, um, I'm gonna talk a little

bit about why I think re attorneys

81

:

are required in a postnup.

82

:

Um, and I think the biggest difference

is before you get married, you don't

83

:

have spousal rights because you're

not married, and so you're sort of.

84

:

Preconceiving and what's gonna

happen, but, but you have

85

:

the option to not be married.

86

:

So if we're doing a prenuptial

agreement and we're starting to bring

87

:

up some stuff and it's not like, Ooh,

I didn't know you felt that way, and

88

:

maybe we shouldn't get married, you

still have the option to opt out.

89

:

Mm-hmm.

90

:

Because you're not married.

91

:

Speaker: Right.

92

:

Speaker 2: In a post optional agreement,

those spousal rights are in place because

93

:

we have signed and we are married, right?

94

:

Mm-hmm.

95

:

And so understanding your rights

is super, super important.

96

:

And that's why I believe both, that both,

both people, both partners need attorneys,

97

:

both spouses need attorneys so that there

is a very clear understanding because.

98

:

Basically, to answer your question,

a postnuptial agreement is really a

99

:

legally binding contract that you enter

after you're married, and it typically

100

:

talks about things like financial rights

and responsibilities that you have

101

:

during the marriage and what happens

in the event of a divorce and or death.

102

:

So it has two components to it.

103

:

And usually we're looking at

provisions that are, what is the

104

:

division of property look like?

105

:

We can talk about spousal maintenance,

106

:

Speaker 3: which

107

:

Speaker 2: is alimony.

108

:

Speaker 3: Mm-hmm.

109

:

Speaker 2: We can talk about inheritances.

110

:

Maybe there's a large inheritance

that's happened or maybe

111

:

somebody started a business.

112

:

And they hadn't, nobody thought

they were gonna do that.

113

:

It kind of takes what's happening

in your life and allows you to have

114

:

these conver conversations that I

think really is more about a tool for

115

:

strengthening and working through the

things that maybe are hard right now.

116

:

Speaker 3: Mm-hmm.

117

:

And

118

:

Speaker 2: coming up with a solution for

it that everybody's comfortable with.

119

:

Because the thing is, is it's a contract

and it has to be done by agreement.

120

:

So both people have to agree.

121

:

Speaker 3: Mm-hmm.

122

:

Speaker 2: In order for

it to be legally binding.

123

:

Speaker 3: Mm-hmm.

124

:

Speaker 2: What's interesting

too is that we can't actually

125

:

talk about the kids' stuff.

126

:

So here's what I'll say.

127

:

We can talk about the kids' stuff, but

we can't really determine child custody

128

:

or child support the way we can with,

with alimony or spousal maintenance.

129

:

I.

130

:

And we can't do that in

a prenup or a postnup.

131

:

Either way, kids are sort of off

the table in that realm because

132

:

the, the rule is really more about

what's in the child's best interest.

133

:

Yeah.

134

:

Is that those things are happening,

so we're not gonna overlay kid stuff.

135

:

That being said, one of the benefits

to a collaborative postnup tool

136

:

agreement is that I can bring in

professionals like a Brian Burns,

137

:

um, who are family specialists and

maybe we have conversations about.

138

:

What's happening with the kids and what

would be a better sort of way forward, I'm

139

:

not gonna put it into a legally binding

document, but we can have other kinds

140

:

of support for things that are mm-hmm.

141

:

Hard during the marriage.

142

:

Yeah.

143

:

Which I think is really,

um, a powerful tool.

144

:

Speaker: Right.

145

:

Speaker 2: Utilized already.

146

:

Speaker: Okay.

147

:

So are they always just about finances?

148

:

Speaker 2: They don't have to

be from a legal standpoint, it's

149

:

a lot about finances usually.

150

:

Um, but that's one of the reasons I

think collaborative is so important

151

:

in doing it this way is because we can

then talk about other things, right?

152

:

Speaker 3: Mm-hmm.

153

:

Speaker 2: And we can create contracts.

154

:

I think most of the prenups and

postnup that I do are focused on

155

:

the financial side of things, um,

because that's the part that sort of.

156

:

Legally we care about, you know?

157

:

Mm-hmm.

158

:

We care about real estate.

159

:

We have lots of laws about real estate.

160

:

We have lots of laws about assets.

161

:

And so that's one of the, probably the

biggest parts of a postnuptial agreement

162

:

is working through those questions.

163

:

Speaker: Right.

164

:

And I have some, um, clients who

are thinking they may want to

165

:

stay together and maybe one person

has had an issue with dishonesty.

166

:

Or lots of affairs or, and I think that

is actually the biggest issue, that the

167

:

one party is concerned about the, the

trust and you know, but they want it.

168

:

They wanna work it out and

they wanna stay together, but

169

:

they want to have parameters.

170

:

And I know, like in one situation

that I'm thinking about, I mean, I

171

:

think one way you could do it is.

172

:

If any finances go towards one of these

because there were, there was money

173

:

involved in the, I don't even know how

to describe this without saying it.

174

:

Like in the affair type.

175

:

Okay.

176

:

In

177

:

Speaker 2: discretion.

178

:

Speaker: Yes.

179

:

So, so you could kind of make it about

finances, but it's not really about that.

180

:

So how do you, how do you work with that?

181

:

Speaker 2: You know, it's kind of a

balancing act, quite frankly, because

182

:

one of the things that, um, can answer

the trust dishonesty question in a

183

:

postnuptial agreement is that there

is a requirement of full disclosure,

184

:

Speaker 3: right?

185

:

So

186

:

Speaker 2: if we're feeling like, I

don't really know what's going on.

187

:

One of the bars that we have to jump

over, the hurdle is that we have to

188

:

fully disclose the financial situation

for both spouses, and that's really,

189

:

really important because if it's

not fully disclosed, then later on

190

:

there could be a claim of fraud.

191

:

I.

192

:

Um, which would then could blow

up the contract basically, right?

193

:

We're sharing statements, we're sharing

tax returns, we're sharing bank accounts.

194

:

I mean, we're starting to put, bring

things into the light essentially,

195

:

is what that agreement can do.

196

:

Speaker: So then, so then how does the,

the one party who is kind of policing

197

:

the money and wants to make sure that

it's not going to something that's.

198

:

Not agreed upon.

199

:

Um, how do they stay on top of that?

200

:

Like, do they just have to keep watching

out for it or how, how does that work?

201

:

And maybe this is for

a therapist, Melissa.

202

:

I don't know.

203

:

I'll say therapist in

204

:

Speaker 2: charge as much as I do.

205

:

And they're more qualified.

206

:

I don't for sure.

207

:

Yeah.

208

:

You know, here's, here's a

thought about that though.

209

:

This would be in a collaborative case

where we're putting a postnuptial

210

:

agreement together, where I would

bring in a financial neutral.

211

:

And what we're really doing is

we're creating ultimately a list of.

212

:

The assets and which assets go to

which spouse or which assets are joint.

213

:

And a financial planner

can help us do that.

214

:

So we're really stamping a

point in time that says what our

215

:

financial picture looks like.

216

:

Speaker: So what this does for the

person who feels a little bit ill at

217

:

ease is they've got this stamped in

time and you know that this party wants

218

:

to stay, he wants to stay married.

219

:

Mm-hmm.

220

:

Um, but now he feels

like he's got something.

221

:

If it does go to divorce, and it might

be something for the other party to

222

:

realize, okay, I don't wanna blow

this, I really don't wanna blow this.

223

:

I don't know.

224

:

Does that make sense?

225

:

Speaker 2: Yeah, it does.

226

:

Um, and, and, uh, quite frankly, I'm,

I'm a big proponent of therapy anyway.

227

:

Like I know, I think it's

super, um, beneficial.

228

:

So the um, the feeling side of money.

229

:

Right.

230

:

Um, can be handled with the

support of other professionals too.

231

:

Speaker: Amen.

232

:

Speaker 2: You know, um, the thing

that, what that's interesting about

233

:

these kinds of agreements is that

they have to be fair and equitable.

234

:

Speaker: That's what I

was gonna ask you about.

235

:

So there's no way that

it could be lopsided.

236

:

Well, if they agreed and were both

represented, could it be lopsided?

237

:

Speaker 2: Yes.

238

:

Mm-hmm.

239

:

Because I guess the, the

determination of what's fair and

240

:

equitable is based on what, right.

241

:

Right.

242

:

So if, um, a couple says, I think this

is fair and equitable, I think it's fair.

243

:

Here's an example.

244

:

Let's say, um, there was a spouse

that, um, started a business.

245

:

Mm-hmm.

246

:

As the other spouse, I could say, I

think it's fair and equitable that

247

:

if that business skyrockets, that

it's still just my spouse's business.

248

:

That was their work.

249

:

That's they blood, sweat, and tears.

250

:

I'm okay with that.

251

:

Speaker 3: Mm-hmm.

252

:

Speaker 2: And also if it tanks,

I don't wanna have any part of it.

253

:

Like I don't wanna be financially ruined

if this business doesn't take off.

254

:

So that could be considered fair

and equitable by both sides.

255

:

My business, I sink or swim

with it and it doesn't affect

256

:

financially my spouse or maybe the

spouses feel totally differently.

257

:

Maybe they're like, you know what?

258

:

You're doing this venture and

I'm fully supportive of it and

259

:

we're gonna sink or swim together.

260

:

I think both could be fair and

equitable, but it's really dependent

261

:

on the people making the agreement.

262

:

The spouse.

263

:

Right.

264

:

Speaker: And I'm, I'm thinking of, and

there's a lot of people that I work

265

:

with that own their own businesses.

266

:

Mm-hmm.

267

:

It wouldn't be a bad idea to have a

postnup, even if you have a super happy,

268

:

happy marriage because that is tricky.

269

:

I.

270

:

Speaker 2: Like, how are

we gonna handle that?

271

:

Speaker: Yes.

272

:

Speaker 2: It's so,

273

:

Speaker: so complicated.

274

:

Speaker 2: Yeah, it really is.

275

:

And the other thing you could think about

too would be like, let's say we've decided

276

:

that one of the spouses is gonna stay home

and leave the workforce and raise kids.

277

:

I can't tell you how many couples

I meet and I would just be guilty

278

:

of this too, when I was in my

twenties, like there was no way I

279

:

was ever gonna leave the workforce.

280

:

I would absolutely have

said hi, there's no way.

281

:

And there was a period of time that I did.

282

:

Speaker 3: Me too.

283

:

Speaker 2: I stay home for a while.

284

:

And, um, one could consider at that

point like, okay, well that affects my

285

:

ability to earn income and what does

that look like for me if things don't

286

:

go the way we think they're gonna go.

287

:

And so I think that's another

time or another common reason

288

:

that people kind of start talking

about postnuptial agreements.

289

:

Speaker: Okay.

290

:

Melissa, another light.

291

:

Um, that just lit my brain on fire.

292

:

And I love that you said that

because I always felt kind of sad.

293

:

I.

294

:

I, I did stay home with my

kids for a period of time,

295

:

um, and was so happy to do it.

296

:

And yeah, I don't have the

career that my husband has.

297

:

I don't, because, you

know, you give a lot.

298

:

And I remember going to a continuing

legal education course in family

299

:

law and this well-known family law

attorney said if you are married.

300

:

Do not ever stay home with your kids.

301

:

'cause you will.

302

:

She basically said, you will get screwed.

303

:

Speaker 2: Oh, that just makes

me, you're like, yeah, I know.

304

:

Speaker: And I, and I was

like, wow, that's really happy,

305

:

but okay, here's your answer.

306

:

Do a post-up.

307

:

Mm-hmm.

308

:

Do a post-up because maybe it's fair and

equitable that you get a little bit more.

309

:

Right, because you've put in I

Am the wind beneath his wings.

310

:

Speaker 2: And, and I feel you.

311

:

And, and like that, you know, your

life is possible because of my life.

312

:

Yes.

313

:

Like we all lean on each other and I

think it's hard when you, um, haven't

314

:

had children yet to know how you

might feel about it in the moment

315

:

Speaker: and you might Oh, but yes.

316

:

Right.

317

:

And Melissa say, I'm gonna say same thing.

318

:

Never thought.

319

:

I would ever be a stay at home mom.

320

:

Never even crossed my mind.

321

:

It was just like, and then I remember

my best friend had a baby probably,

322

:

uh, like five months before I did.

323

:

She's like, Ooh.

324

:

Watch out, you're not gonna

wanna go back to work.

325

:

I'm like, what?

326

:

Speaker 2: No.

327

:

Speaker: What are you talking about?

328

:

You know?

329

:

And then it was like,

330

:

Speaker 2: I think you

don't wanna go back.

331

:

Like you think, oh, I'm gonna totally

wanna be home and do all of this.

332

:

And then you're like, wow, this is a very

333

:

Speaker: Right.

334

:

Speaker 2: I need to get out the house.

335

:

Yes.

336

:

Speaker: Oh, there are those moments too.

337

:

We all have a little bit of both.

338

:

And that's the thing too, to just

know that I have a daughter who.

339

:

Just is finishing up her residency.

340

:

She's a medical doctor and she's

like, has no desire to stay

341

:

home and she's a beautiful mama.

342

:

And so I'm not saying that either,

so I don't want, I am like all about

343

:

that is so personal and so, yeah.

344

:

Everybody's own path.

345

:

Speaker 2: Yep.

346

:

And you don't know what you don't know.

347

:

Right?

348

:

Right.

349

:

And you also don't know what your

financial situation would be, what your

350

:

spouse is gonna be doing, what kind of

flexibility those jobs have, you know?

351

:

So there's a lot that I think

goes into those decisions.

352

:

But life is long and life happens too.

353

:

And so there's adjustments and

things we can make along the

354

:

way to have those conversations.

355

:

Because if you do have a spouse

leaving the workforce, it might be

356

:

a really good time to do a check-in.

357

:

Where are we financially?

358

:

What do we want this to look like?

359

:

Speaker: Right,

360

:

Speaker 2: right.

361

:

So I, that's why I call it marital

estate planning because I don't

362

:

feel like it's a one and done.

363

:

Speaker: Okay.

364

:

And I love what you're saying too,

because as I'm thinking about my daughter,

365

:

um, this can go the other way too.

366

:

So her husband is an engineer and

he had to take on all the kids

367

:

stuff really through her residency.

368

:

I mean, it was, it was a lot.

369

:

And, um.

370

:

Um, probably didn't get to do what maybe

he would have done with his career.

371

:

So it's just a little bit of a flip side.

372

:

Mm-hmm.

373

:

I just see this as this is a breath

of fresh air to me, and I feel

374

:

like stay at home moms do this.

375

:

Stay at home Dads do this.

376

:

Do a postnup, why

wouldn't you feel better?

377

:

You know?

378

:

Yeah.

379

:

Speaker 2: It's not like the law doesn't

protect people who choose to stay home.

380

:

It it, it does in some respects.

381

:

I

382

:

Speaker: agree with you, Melissa, too,

and I have always said, I want this to be

383

:

less scary for you because if you don't

have this set up, you are gonna be okay.

384

:

Yeah, yeah,

385

:

Speaker 2: you are.

386

:

There are things that are set

up and, and I think what's nice

387

:

about it is that you then get to

know what those things are, right?

388

:

Yes.

389

:

And then you can decide if that's

what you want or don't want and what

390

:

works for you and what's fair and

equitable for you in your situation.

391

:

And agree.

392

:

Again, this is all by agreement, so both.

393

:

Both sides, both spouses have to agree

to it in order for it to be enforceable.

394

:

I mean, otherwise you're

not gonna sign it.

395

:

Right.

396

:

Speaker: Right.

397

:

Speaker 2: Um, the other thing that's

interesting about these kinds of

398

:

agreements is that they really are,

there's, I'm gonna throw some legal

399

:

language in here, but there the

courts would look at whether it was

400

:

procedurally fair to have the agreement.

401

:

So that's kind of where two lawyers

coming in, I think is super helpful

402

:

because we understand the procedure.

403

:

Mm-hmm.

404

:

And then is

405

:

Speaker 3: it

406

:

Speaker 2: substantively.

407

:

Fair at the time when you signed it

and at the time that you enforce it.

408

:

Speaker: Okay,

409

:

Speaker 2: so, so there is definitely like

legal oversight from a court's perspective

410

:

if we have to go there where we're looking

at not only was this procedurally and

411

:

sub substantively fair when we signed it,

but also at the point of enforceability.

412

:

And so now we're talking about

the foreseeability of life, right?

413

:

Nobody has a crystal ball.

414

:

Speaker: Right.

415

:

Speaker 2: So, you know, has the change

when we're trying to enforce it, been so

416

:

dramatic that, that it's just completely

would like shock your mind mm-hmm.

417

:

That we would enforce it at that time.

418

:

Those, that's a pretty

big high bar to jump.

419

:

So we, we do get to have conversations

about, you know, what happens if

420

:

somebody gets disabled and can't work?

421

:

Mm-hmm.

422

:

What happens if.

423

:

Somebody leaves the workforce.

424

:

What happens if somebody owns a business?

425

:

What happens if somebody gets an

inheritance that's really large?

426

:

Mm-hmm.

427

:

How do you wanna handle that as a family?

428

:

And those are the kinds of

conversations you get to have when

429

:

you're doing agreements like this.

430

:

Speaker: Yeah, I love that.

431

:

I, okay, I love that you name those.

432

:

The inheritance I was thinking

of like the stay at home mom who

433

:

suddenly became a huge sensation

on Instagram and was making no.

434

:

And of dollars.

435

:

And then, you know, is it still fair?

436

:

Right.

437

:

That's the one that popped in my head.

438

:

Where's that a little more reasonable?

439

:

Make a little more sense.

440

:

Well, we've got influencers, right?

441

:

And if you, if you hit a

442

:

Speaker 2: pig, who knows, right?

443

:

Yeah.

444

:

I think there's, um, I feel like there's

a woman who's taking, who does pictures

445

:

of her baby and I can't remember,

it's like very artistic and stuff.

446

:

And I think she's doing

really well, hopefully,

447

:

Speaker 3: right.

448

:

Speaker 2: So that kind

of stuff can happen.

449

:

I mean, I think that's, you know, that's.

450

:

That's just the cool

stuff life offers you.

451

:

And then if that's happening, you

get to make a decision about it.

452

:

Right?

453

:

So, um, the other thing too that I wanna

say is that a prenuptial agreement is

454

:

like valid or presumed enforceable when

you sign it, like when you get married.

455

:

So you sign it in advance and then there's

provisions about that state's on that.

456

:

We won't get into the details on

that, but when you get married that

457

:

that agreement is now enforceable

with a quote, but it's not

458

:

Speaker: before you're married.

459

:

Speaker 2: Not before you.

460

:

Usually the marriage

is what is the impetus.

461

:

That's that now.

462

:

Now it exists.

463

:

Now it's sort of a valid mm-hmm.

464

:

And can be executed kind of a

document with a postnuptial agreement.

465

:

And this is Minnesota law

too, so you definitely wanna

466

:

check the the state you're in.

467

:

But a postnuptial agreement is

presumed to be unenforceable.

468

:

If a divorce is filed within

two years of its execution.

469

:

Okay, so

470

:

Speaker: unless, say that

one more time, I'm sorry.

471

:

Speaker 2: So we're gonna, when

we do a postnuptial agreement,

472

:

Uhhuh, we're gonna presume that

it's not enforceable for two years.

473

:

Speaker: Why?

474

:

Speaker 2: Well, I think the

reason for this is because we

475

:

don't wanna emphasize a quick fix.

476

:

For a failing marriage, it's not really

about let's just jump in and do a postnup.

477

:

It's more like, this is thoughtful,

we're gonna do it, and then we've got two

478

:

years before it's presumed enforceable.

479

:

That doesn't mean that somebody

who's trying to enforce it.

480

:

Earlier than two years, can't try to

enforce it and say this was fair for

481

:

all the reasons and, but we're gonna

have to have a judgment about that.

482

:

Right.

483

:

So the

484

:

Speaker: presumption is, that's so

interesting to me, Melissa, because

485

:

I feel like it's closer to when

you did it, and so it holds truth.

486

:

Closer to when you sign it because

you are in that financial situation.

487

:

Right.

488

:

Then three years from now, that

might change and that's when it's

489

:

enforceable, but it's not the day after.

490

:

I don't understand.

491

:

Speaker 2: Yeah.

492

:

That's, that's the law and I

really think it's about, um,

493

:

making sure that a postnuptial

agreement isn't a divorce document.

494

:

Right.

495

:

Okay.

496

:

Like we're not predetermining our

divorce and then doing this agreement

497

:

and then the next day getting divorced.

498

:

This is like meant to be a way

to say, this isn't a quick fix.

499

:

This is a marital estate plan.

500

:

Right.

501

:

The other thing you have to remember too

is that the pre, and this is why I talked

502

:

about prenuptial agreements first, before

you get married, your choice is to not

503

:

get married if you don't wanna do it.

504

:

Right, right, right.

505

:

In a postnuptial

agreement, you are married.

506

:

And so we wanna make sure that we're

addressing issues and, and these

507

:

agreements are meant to last a long

time, but there's this period of time,

508

:

and I think that's because your spousal

rights are in place and there might

509

:

be some giving up with some of those

spousal rights if you're choosing to

510

:

do that, where you got to a two year

period of time where if somebody did go

511

:

for and decide to file for divorce, that

the presumption is that the agreement

512

:

you made is not gonna be enforceable.

513

:

That's a big difference

between prenups and postnup.

514

:

Speaker: Okay.

515

:

Mm-hmm.

516

:

All right.

517

:

Yeah, I kinda, I mean, I

totally hear what you're saying.

518

:

I, I've, I've never really

wrapped my head around this

519

:

and, and I probably should have.

520

:

Um, but that's interesting.

521

:

That's just interesting to me that

it's not enforceable for two years.

522

:

Speaker 2: I think part of that

is because it's in the context of.

523

:

I just ongoing marriage.

524

:

Right, right.

525

:

And I'm just thinking, answering.

526

:

Yeah.

527

:

And the post-up is really about navigating

changes within an existing marriage.

528

:

And so, okay, so So maybe I'm to that.

529

:

Speaker: Yeah, I'm sorry.

530

:

I don't mean to overtalk you.

531

:

I just have so many questions.

532

:

So I'm thinking maybe I'm thinking

about using this maybe the wrong

533

:

way because I am thinking about

using it to save a marriage because

534

:

they are right at the brink of.

535

:

I kinda wanna get divorced

if this doesn't change.

536

:

Mm-hmm.

537

:

And so he is, you know, they're not

going, it's not going to do for them

538

:

what they need it to do because he is

not gonna wanna pay for a, for this to be

539

:

done, you know, I mean, it's legal fees.

540

:

Mm-hmm.

541

:

If.

542

:

She's not following through.

543

:

You know what I mean?

544

:

So maybe this isn't really

help me through this.

545

:

Is this really going to help them?

546

:

Because I don't know if

they can make it two years.

547

:

Speaker 2: Well, that's really, I

mean, so that's the thing, right?

548

:

I think.

549

:

Speaker: But they would rather try.

550

:

Speaker 2: So what is, what is

the definition of try, I guess?

551

:

Yeah.

552

:

Because if trying two years

doesn't seem like that much to me.

553

:

Like if we're really trying and we're

putting all of this together and

554

:

we're doing disclosures of information

and we're making a new agreement for

555

:

the future of our marriage with the

intent that we're staying together.

556

:

Then the two years

shouldn't really matter.

557

:

Speaker: Well, and I guess it does

558

:

Speaker 2: file for divorce in

those two years and it just doesn't.

559

:

Right.

560

:

It's just that it's not, or I guess

after the two years, if it's still

561

:

not working, then you, then you made

a plan for what that would look like.

562

:

Right.

563

:

But you have two years to sit on it.

564

:

And I think it's really, um.

565

:

Trying to handle, um, a contract,

a marriage that you're already in

566

:

that has legal, um, legal rights

and lemo legal ramifications for

567

:

the choices that you're making, that

nobody's making them under duress.

568

:

Nobody's making them with the feeling

of being forced into something.

569

:

Um, I think it gives.

570

:

Grace to the fact that you're already

married and that those decisions should

571

:

be handled with sensitivity and, um,

an understanding of this is like a

572

:

longer term solution and trying to be

helpful for building in resilience.

573

:

Speaker: Yep, I get it.

574

:

I get it.

575

:

And so I see it.

576

:

Um, it, it's not for someone who's

making one last stitch effort to stay

577

:

together, but it could be, it could be

a deep breath for even this person who

578

:

is trying to figure out what to do.

579

:

Maybe he gives it two years and maybe

then he knows I've done everything I can.

580

:

Yeah.

581

:

And, you know, and now, so

I, and I have two years.

582

:

Yeah.

583

:

And yeah, so, so now I kind of

get it, we've worked through

584

:

this a little in my head.

585

:

I kind of get it.

586

:

Here's the thing, here's

what I think about.

587

:

Speaker 2: So, um, I don't know if this

is gonna actually answer the question

588

:

directly, so it might be, we might be

circling around a little bit, but when

589

:

we are doing a postnuptial agreement.

590

:

I don't think of it if we're doing it in

a traditional way, and by traditional,

591

:

I mean maybe not a collaborative way.

592

:

I feel like they tend to be, this

is true for collaborative too, but

593

:

it, they tend to be started in times

when there's marital strain, right?

594

:

Or there's some major financial events.

595

:

And it can oftentimes feel, I think

like one spouse is sort of trying to

596

:

protect themselves from the other,

which can add to like, if you do a

597

:

traditional prenup, I think it can add

to defensiveness and mistrust and things

598

:

like that because it's sort of a, mm-hmm.

599

:

The negotiations can be pretty contentious

and that can increase marital stress.

600

:

I mean, it's, it can be born

out of this fear, I think.

601

:

Speaker 3: Mm-hmm.

602

:

Speaker 2: I think what

you're talking about, mm-hmm.

603

:

Versus a sort of shared

vision for the future.

604

:

Right.

605

:

So this collaborative overlay, I think,

pulls us a little bit out of that

606

:

traditional sort of like, ah, we're

trying to, you know, scrape and, and

607

:

handle this in a sort of increasingly

stressful situation with a way that.

608

:

Both attorneys and both spouses

because you have to have an

609

:

attorney in a postnup, whether it's

a collaborative attorney or not.

610

:

Right.

611

:

Right.

612

:

But the, the attorneys and the

couple then is committed to

613

:

resolving the financial problems.

614

:

Outside of the court.

615

:

Right?

616

:

'cause this is all by agreement, right?

617

:

If we're gonna use the court,

we're getting divorced.

618

:

So, well,

619

:

Speaker: and I was just thinking of

this, Melissa, we probably should kind of

620

:

explain to the listeners, you don't have

to do this with collaborative attorneys.

621

:

No.

622

:

So you could, but you just each

have to have an attorney and tell.

623

:

Explain, just for listeners who don't

know, what is the difference if you're

624

:

working with collaborative versus just.

625

:

Regular attorneys.

626

:

Speaker 2: Okay.

627

:

And I will say that lots of attorneys

will, will say that I'm a collaborative

628

:

attorney, like I work collaboratively with

629

:

Speaker 3: others.

630

:

Yeah.

631

:

Speaker 2: Right.

632

:

Um, I think in a traditional

attorney relationship, um.

633

:

The conversation is sort of like

telephone tag where the, uh,

634

:

client talks to their attorney.

635

:

That attorney talks to the other attorney.

636

:

That attorney talks to their client.

637

:

So you can kind of see how this becomes

like a negotiation and a, you know,

638

:

well, the attorneys are really sort

of there to negotiate for you, but

639

:

you're not really interacting with

each other, the collaborative process.

640

:

Really is about everybody

being at the table together.

641

:

And so the attorneys are given the ability

to be more open about the communication

642

:

and the sharing of information, and

it's really a problem solving approach

643

:

versus maybe like a negotiation.

644

:

It's still negotiation, but

the overlay is the goal.

645

:

The very first meeting we have

in a collaborative process is to

646

:

say, what is, what are your goals?

647

:

For the process, not what are

your goals of how I get this,

648

:

and he gets that and whatever.

649

:

But like, what are your

goals for this process?

650

:

And if the goal really is that

we're trying to work this out, then

651

:

having this collaborative overlay

that has a problem solving approach,

652

:

I think is really beneficial.

653

:

And so that's why we can bring in coaches

and neutrals who talk about finances

654

:

and the, that sort of landscape and the

emotional dynamics of what are happening.

655

:

That's not gonna happen in a traditional,

most traditional attorneys are gonna

656

:

be like, go to somebody else for that.

657

:

Speaker: Right.

658

:

Okay.

659

:

So collaborative, they each

just talk to their attorney,

660

:

or do you all meet together In

collaborative, we can be all together.

661

:

So you all like Consi

do a Zoom call together?

662

:

Mm-hmm.

663

:

Okay.

664

:

That's what I was wondering.

665

:

Isn't that

666

:

Speaker 2: crazy?

667

:

Speaker: No, but I like that because

that, I like it when people can

668

:

just talk yes to each other instead

of like through someone else.

669

:

So that sounds like a

great open way to do it.

670

:

Speaker 2: Well, and I think too,

the, so the attorneys who do this

671

:

work are trained in the process and

um, I know that when I'm working with

672

:

the attorneys who do that, we still.

673

:

Advocate.

674

:

Right.

675

:

All of that.

676

:

Right.

677

:

Right.

678

:

But I also know that I'm not

gonna get an email that's gonna

679

:

fire up my client purposefully.

680

:

Right, right.

681

:

That can be a negotiation tactic.

682

:

Right.

683

:

So I really feel like it.

684

:

I.

685

:

The, it shifts the conversation from

like my assets and your assets to

686

:

like, what is our financial future.

687

:

Speaker 3: Mm-hmm.

688

:

Speaker 2: That's a different

way of thinking about it, right?

689

:

Yep.

690

:

Um, it really promotes this sort

of financial transparency and we're

691

:

trying to do it in a safe, non

adversarial environment, right?

692

:

Traditional approach.

693

:

It's more of an adversarial environment.

694

:

Speaker: Mm-hmm.

695

:

Speaker 2: Does that make sense?

696

:

Speaker: It totally makes

sense, and I'm thinking about.

697

:

It's not, um, always going to be

a mistake for someone who's trying

698

:

to take one last ditch effort.

699

:

It's just that they need to be aware

that this is a two year process.

700

:

Speaker 2: Once it's signed,

there's a two year process.

701

:

Yeah.

702

:

Period, if you will.

703

:

Right,

704

:

Speaker: right.

705

:

So I can see, I can see so many

advantages to having this and like.

706

:

If you start a business, if you decide

to stay at home, you know who, if

707

:

you lose your job, whatever it is,

what a great way to do it together

708

:

when your head's in the right place.

709

:

Speaker 2: Yeah, and I, you know,

I think one of the things that when

710

:

you're already married you there is this

sort of owing each other a fiduciary.

711

:

Responsibility or a duty to each other

and sort of having a higher standard

712

:

of care because you're already married.

713

:

Mm-hmm.

714

:

You've made the decision.

715

:

You are together, and we wanna be able

to respect that and reinforce it if

716

:

we can, through added transparency

and added conversations about fairness

717

:

and really navigating the changes

that have happened in a marriage

718

:

is really how I think about it.

719

:

Speaker: Yeah.

720

:

Speaker 2: And that we're really trying to

not plan for the failure of the marriage.

721

:

Speaker: Right.

722

:

Speaker 2: So you talk about last

ditch effort, that rings a little

723

:

bit of like, oh, we're kind of

724

:

Speaker: right.

725

:

Speaker 2: But I really think it's

more about planning to be resilient.

726

:

Yeah.

727

:

So all the things that life

kind of throws your away

728

:

Speaker: planning to be resilient.

729

:

I love that quote.

730

:

And with that my dear, we have

gone way over time and this is

731

:

going to be a two part series.

732

:

We weren't sure.

733

:

We just started chatting.

734

:

But Melissa, I so appreciate you taking

the extra time and I think these tools.

735

:

Can help marriages and I love that,

and they can help the divorce go

736

:

smoother, which we know how you end.

737

:

One thing is how you begin another, so

you might as well end it smoothly and

738

:

you know to the best of your ability.

739

:

So listeners, if you're looking for

a collaborative attorney for estate

740

:

planning or pre and postnuptial.

741

:

Melissa is located in Woodbury, but

you know, we can reach as far now.

742

:

Right.

743

:

Minnesota, how can they, I'll have it in

the show notes, but how can they find you?

744

:

Um, best

745

:

Speaker 2: to go on my website,

which is my last name, which

746

:

you can see below me now.

747

:

Yep.

748

:

Mi savage law.com.

749

:

And there's a little form there that

you can fill out and I can do, um, if

750

:

you say that you've listened to this

podcast, I can do a quick consultation

751

:

complimentary just to do a check-in

752

:

Speaker: for sure.

753

:

Awesome.

754

:

Awesome.

755

:

Well, thank you so much.

756

:

Thanks for being here.

757

:

And I probably am gonna have you

back to pick your brain again.

758

:

Sounds good.

759

:

Happy to do it.

760

:

Thanks so much.

761

:

Take good care.

762

:

Bye.

Listen for free

Show artwork for Doing Life Different with Lesa Koski

About the Podcast

Doing Life Different with Lesa Koski
Real conversations for women over 40 about faith, fitness, and fresh starts
Mindset, movement, and faith after 40—because midlife isn’t a crisis, it’s your comeback.

Welcome to Doing Life Different with Lesa Koski, the podcast for women over 40 who are ready to rewrite the rules, reclaim their joy, and rediscover their purpose. Whether you're navigating divorce, rediscovering your health, deepening your faith, or learning how to have fun again—you’re in the right place.

Host Lesa Koski—wife, mom, coach, and seasoned mediator—brings real talk, relatable wisdom, and expert interviews to guide you through midlife reinvention with grace and grit.

In each episode, you’ll get practical tools and empowering conversations on:

Mindset & personal growth

Faith & spiritual connection

Fitness, movement & health

Divorce, marriage & relationships

Fun, purpose & starting fresh in the second half of life

This isn’t just self-help. It’s soul-level transformation. Get ready to do life different—because your next chapter starts now.

Lesa also explores the emotional and physical changes that often accompany midlife and major life shifts. From navigating the impact of menopause on your health, marriage, and mood, to dealing with the loneliness that can come after divorce or empty nesting, you’ll find honest conversations that don’t shy away from real-life challenges. And for those of you in your 40s, 50s, or beyond, you’ll discover what it means to truly build a better life after 40.

Health and wellness are deeply integrated into this journey. Lesa shares insights on the benefits of rest, joy, nutrition, fasting, protein, and bone health, along with the power of movement, community, and exercise to support mental clarity and physical strength. You’ll learn how to take care of yourself with intention—because healing isn’t just emotional, it’s also biological.

Mindset work and self-coaching are recurring tools offered in episodes to help you reframe your story and shift from fear to freedom. And through it all, the show honors the role of faith, spiritual surrender, and letting God lead you through every season. Whether you're leaning into your relationship with God for the first time or deepening a lifelong practice, you’ll hear how surrender can bring peace even in the hardest moments.

You’ll hear real stories from people who have done divorce differently, saved their marriages, or found new love and purpose on the other side. Lesa also brings in conversations about marriages that have stood the test of time, co-parenting through complex seasons, and the realities of parenting after separation while maintaining stability for your kids.

This is a podcast about thriving through Cancer, taking back your life, rewriting your future, and trusting that you’re not starting over, you’re starting better. If you’re craving practical advice, soul-level encouragement, and real conversations about creating a healthy, joyful, purpose-driven life, you’ve found your community.

Subscribe now and join Lesa Koski for weekly episodes that will help you grow stronger in your relationships, your health, and your faith, no matter where you’re starting from.

About the Host:
I’ve spent over 25 years helping families navigate amicable divorce as a lawyer and mediator, always focused on protecting what matters most—your kids and your peace of mind. But my mission has expanded. Today, I support women over 40 not just through endings, but in building stronger relationships—and sometimes even saving their marriages. I’m a breast cancer survivor, a cowgirl at heart, a wellness advocate, and a follower of Jesus. My life and faith fuel my passion for helping women thrive.

About your host

Profile picture for Lesa Koski

Lesa Koski